Artificial Intelligence in the Fight Against Superficial Peer Reviews: The LazyReview Dataset

Peer reviews, the evaluation of scientific papers by colleagues, are an essential component of quality management in the publication process. The increasing number of submissions, however, leads to a higher workload for reviewers, which increases the risk of superficial, heuristic-based assessments. This phenomenon, referred to as "lazy thinking" in English, can jeopardize the quality of the reviews and thus scientific integrity. To counteract this problem, automated methods for detecting such superficial thinking are gaining importance.

Previous research in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) on this topic is limited, and a practical dataset to support the development of corresponding detection tools has been lacking. The recently introduced LazyReview dataset addresses this gap. It consists of sentences from peer reviews annotated with detailed categories of "lazy thinking." This categorization allows for a differentiated understanding of the various manifestations of superficial reviewing and forms the basis for training AI models.

Initial analyses show that large language models (LLMs) have difficulty recognizing these superficial ways of thinking in a zero-shot setting, i.e., without prior training with specific data. However, through instructed fine-tuning with the LazyReview dataset, performance can be significantly increased by 10-20 percentage points. This underscores the importance of high-quality training data for the development of effective detection systems.

A controlled experiment also demonstrates that reviews revised based on lazy-thinking feedback are more comprehensive and action-oriented than those created without this feedback. The provision of the LazyReview dataset and extended guidelines, which can be used for training junior reviewers, thus promises an improvement of the entire peer-review process.

LazyReview and the Role of AI Partners like Mindverse

The development and application of the LazyReview dataset illustrates the potential of AI in scientific operations. Companies like Mindverse, which specialize in AI-powered content solutions, can make an important contribution to the further development of such technologies. With expertise in areas such as chatbots, voicebots, AI search engines, and knowledge systems, Mindverse offers the possibility to develop customized solutions for the integration of LazyReview-based detection tools into existing platforms. This could make the peer-review process more efficient and higher quality, thus supporting the scientific community.

The combination of high-quality datasets like LazyReview and the expertise of AI partners like Mindverse opens up new avenues for optimizing established processes in scientific operations. The automated detection of superficial thinking in peer reviews is just one example of the transformative potential of AI in this area. Future applications could include the development of intelligent assistance systems for reviewers, trained on LazyReview and similar datasets, thus contributing to a more sound and objective evaluation of scientific papers.

Bibliography: - https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11042 - https://arxiv.org/html/2504.11042v1 - https://paperreading.club/page?id=299748 - https://chatpaper.com/chatpaper/?id=3&date=1744732800&page=1 - https://github.com/ukplab - https://aclanthology.org/N18-1149/ - https://paperreading.club/category?cate=Detection