Visual-Language Models and their Limitations in Understanding Image Transformations

Visual-language models (VLMs) have made remarkable progress in recent years and are used in a variety of areas, from image and video generation to visual question-answering systems and multimodal chatbots. Despite their impressive capabilities, these models often reach their limits when it comes to understanding basic image transformations. This article highlights the challenges VLMs face in recognizing and interpreting image manipulations and discusses the impact of these limitations on downstream tasks.

The Gap in Understanding Image Transformations

Studies have shown that even leading VLMs like OpenAI's CLIP and Google's SigLIP struggle to understand various image transformations. While they can recognize and describe objects and scenes in images, they often fail to adequately capture the effects of transformations such as rotation, scaling, or color changes. This gap in understanding becomes apparent when the models are asked to describe transformed images or answer questions about them. Often, they completely ignore the transformations or misinterpret them.

Research Findings and Datasets

To systematically investigate the limitations of VLMs in the context of image transformations, special datasets have been developed. One example is an extended version of the Flickr8k dataset, where each image is accompanied by a detailed description of the applied transformation. Using such datasets, researchers can specifically evaluate the performance of VLMs and identify the specific challenges arising from different transformation types. The research findings suggest that the models have difficulty capturing the semantic meaning of transformations. For example, they may be able to recognize that an image has been rotated, but they don't necessarily understand the effects of this rotation on the spatial relationships between the objects in the image.

Impact on Downstream Tasks

The described limitations have a significant impact on the application of VLMs in downstream tasks, particularly in the field of image editing. For example, image editing programs based on VLMs may have difficulty correctly implementing user instructions if these involve transformations. The development of intelligent image search engines based on semantic image descriptions is also hampered by the gap in understanding transformations.

Future Research and Development

Research in the field of VLMs is increasingly focusing on overcoming the described limitations. One promising approach is to equip the models with explicit knowledge of image transformations and train them to understand the semantic effects of transformations. Another focus is on developing more robust evaluation methods that comprehensively capture the ability of VLMs to interpret image transformations. Progress in this area is crucial for the development of more powerful and reliable VLMs that can be used in a wide variety of applications.

Bibliography: - Anis, A. M., Ali, H., & Sarfraz, S. (2025). On the Limitations of Vision-Language Models in Understanding Image Transforms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09837. - Beebe, N., & Roelofs, R. (2024). Understanding the Limits of Vision-Language Models Through the Lens of the Binding Problem. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00238. - Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulrajani, I., & Bahdanau, D. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078. - Goyal, Y., Khot, T., Summers-Stay, D., Batra, D., & Parikh, D. (2022). Flamingo: a visual language model for few-shot learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 20460-20473. - Li, T., Li, X., Li, C., & Qiao, Y. (2024). Scaling Vision-Language Models with Sparse Mixture of Experts. In Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 12133-12155). - Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., ... & Lin, D. (2024). Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp. 12004-12013). - Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., ... & Sutskever, I. (2021). Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 8748-8763). PMLR. - Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., ... & Sutskever, I. (2022). Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 18779-18794). PMLR. - Yu, J., Xu, D., Koh, J. Y., Baldridge, J., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2022). Scaling up vision-language pre-training for image captioning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 7261-7270).